Critical Thinking and Problem Solving for Recreation-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theCritical Thinking and Problem Solving for Recreation. Answer: Zoos have been considered as a fundamentally accepted part belonging to the social fabric of the cities for several centuries. The concept as well as nature of zoos have transformed with the varying sentiments and economic conditions of nations. Although zoos offer a place for both animals and humans to interact, it further gives rise to several factors of vulnerability, captivity and immorality towards the animals[1]. With the increasing rates of threats towards wild population, contemporary zoos in recent times concentrate of human recreation and entertainment with the cost of animal captivity. The thesis statement of this essay is explore the immorality of zoos that has resulted in animal captivity and effect on the value of the lives of these animals. Zoos as well as wildlife sanctuaries have gained immense popularity because of their contribution to the major tourism industry across the world. The primary purpose of the zoos is to provide entertainment, recreation and knowledge to the people. However, it must be noted that all these forms of entertainment are being offered with the cost of animal captivity. Various kinds of species are kept in complete confinement within a small enclosure in order to offer a close and feasible kind of contact to the local population. The past few months have witnessed a number of deaths of animals held in captivity, which has further raised concerns around the conservation[2]. Contemporary zoos even though have contribution to animal conservation; they are unable to provide any productive outcome to the animal species conservation. A recent incident that occurred at the Cincinnati Zoo in the USA has upturned immense concern and alarm within the domain of animal safeguard domain[3]. Harambe, a gor illa born in captivity was shot to death in order to save a young visitor who fell into his area of enclosure. Another incidence of loss of a Sumatran elephant had taken place in the disreputable park reserve located in Indonesia. All these unfortunate incidents have given rise to several debatable issues related to the lack of security and protection towards the animals as well as the people visiting these animal reserves. However, several zoos can recognized the concern regarding the insufficient space in order to engage in effective breeding programmes for larger mammals. The core immoral practice that is being performed by the contemporary zoos is keeping the animal species in an alienated and isolated environment, whereby causing severe restrictions to their liberty and independence. Animals living in natural habitat can develop their own social orders and further behave in the ways, which are expected from them. Restricting wild animals within a limited space like zoos sabotage their natural pattern as well as their lifecycles[4]. These species further experience a significant environmental as well as change in their habitat. Animals in several zoos fail to have the proper access to vegetation and are therefore exposed to pollution. Although, the zoological industry has claimed to spend a great amount of cost and expenditure in the process of stimulating a natural environment for the animals, it has been reported that grasslands of several zoos contain bacteria further causing harm to the species[5]. These incidents have raised much concern within the human activists who have been seeking to accentuate the necessity of natural environment or habitat for the animals, which would facilitate a normal development of animals. The fundamental concept of depriving animals from their own habitat in order to provide entertainment to humans must be regarded as unethical and immoral activity[6]. Contemporary animal reserves function more as amusement parks rather than animal reserves. Though they have shown gradual progress in the recent times, yet these zoos have their existence in order to enhance their economic development by extracting money for the wealthy societal appetite to offer such entertainment to humans. However, it must be taken into account that even though zoos provide aid to animal conservation, the level of generosity of these contributions fails to accomplish the requirements needed for these species in their exhibits[7]. On the contrary, a large portion of the revenue generated by the zoos is spent on the acquisition of several animals as well as for creating unique displays for the zoos. However, according to a number of critics, zoos have immense contribution to the scientific monitoring of the animal species which thereby has a positive influence on the lives of both humans and animals. Several zoos function as networks, which assist in collecting and further establishing collection of serum banks in order to improve the therapeutic recordkeeping system[8]. However, this has been proven as effective and advantageous in recognizing as well as monitoring the spread of several types of harmful, life risking, infectious diseases. The case of West Nile Virus can be considered as an instance that was initially identified at a particular zoological institution[9]. The classification of this detrimental disease has assisted in preserving animals in the United States where prior to this identification several wild crows were losing their lives because of this unidentified disease. However, this virus has been reportedly causing threats to both the lives of humans as well as animals. Therefore, from the above discussion it can be concluded that although the human-animal association can be beneficial for both the species but it also causes detrimental effects on the lives of animals whose wellbeing and protection lie on the hands of the humans. The paper has shed light on the various aspects of the functioning process of contemporary zoos and their relative impact on the animal species. Thus, it can be brought to conclusion that zoos are not required for accomplishing the entertainment and recreational purposes of humans. Individuals can gain their knowledge regarding wild species by watching documentaries of wild animals, which are filmed in their natural environment and context. Society must take into consideration the implementation and purpose of zoos or other organizations in order to determine the way the current form of activities and existence can be altered. References Barreiros, Joo P., and Vidal Haddad Jr. "Zoo animals and humans killed because of human negligent behavior."Journal of Coastal Life Medicine4, no. 12 (2016): 1008-1008. Friese, Carrie.Cloning wild life: zoos, captivity, and the future of endangered animals. NYU Press, 2013. Hediger, Heini.Wild animals in captivity. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013. Hosey, Geoff, Vicky Melfi, and Sheila Pankhurst.Zoo animals: behaviour, management, and welfare. Oxford University Press, 2013. Keulartz, Jozef. "Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads."Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics28, no. 2 (2015): 335-351. Minteer, Ben A., and James P. Collins. "Ecological ethics in captivity: Balancing values and responsibilities in zoo and aquarium research under rapid global change."ILAR journal54, no. 1 (2013): 41-51. Roehrig, John T. "West Nile virus in the United Statesa historical perspective."Viruses5, no. 12 (2013): 3088-3108. Webber, Sarah, Marcus Carter, Wally Smith, and Frank Vetere. "Interactive technology and humananimal encounters at the zoo."International Journal of Human-Computer Studies98 (2017): 150-168. Ziegler, Ute, Joke Angenvoort, Dominik Fischer, Christine Fast, Martin Eiden, Ariel V. Rodriguez, Sandra Revilla-Fernndez et al. "Pathogenesis of West Nile virus lineage 1 and 2 in experimentally infected large falcons."Veterinary microbiology161, no. 3-4 (2013): 263-273.